--Jiddu Krishnamurti
I spent much of my youth taking cues from the world around me as to what was of value in life, what living well meant and central to this was the notion of being well-adjusted or healthy. My youth was a bit of a bumpy ride as a result--I was diagnosed with a brain tumour the year I turned 21. Even now though, this idea of health seems to be something of an obsession, trouble is what do we really mean by it?
The whole conception seems to set up a series of expectations that life, as it is, cannot sustain. Ideas surrounding mental health, in particular, seem to be fraught with problems because our conceptions often have a heavy cultural bias--we are predisposed through social conditioning to view certain behaviours as favourable and the mark of the well-adjusted, and others as not. Much of our behaviour is dictated by these invisible social filters, and people suffer as a result.
For example, how I understand schizophrenia--what my beliefs are about it--will determine my attitude and behaviour towards people who are schizophrenic. If I understand schizophrenia as a genetic disease that warps the mind in inhuman ways, I will see people suffering from schizophrenia as broken, damaged and, let's be honest, less than human. I will do this because of an ideology that enables me to distance myself from that which scares me or makes me otherwise uncomfortable--I am not that! On the other hand, if I understand schizophrenia like Janis Hunter Jenkins, I may come to see it as emblematic of fundamental human processes at work in all of us, albeit in an amplified form. Who among us doesn't talk to themselves, or fall prey to irrational paranoid thoughts, or experience extremes of emotion that own us sometimes? This perspective allows me to see someone challenged by schizophrenia not as something other than myself, but more as a variant image of myself--very human indeed.
What I mean to say is that some of our notions of health are highly biased and politically charged. If as a society we view mental and physical challenges to health as signs of a failure to live 'right', we will only succeed in alienating us from ourselves. Is diabetes to be regarded as a disease or a brilliant evolutionary adaptation to environmental challenges in times gone by? These are powerful judgements with significant consequences depending on the way we understand things.
It isn't an accident that our society marginalizes the mentally and physically infirm, the sick, the old, and the poor. We need to question the social and cultural rationales that maintain this system of marginalization. And, as Krishnamurti points out, can we really regard ourselves as beacons of radiant health when our behaviour successfully conforms to, and perpetuates such sick societal norms?
The cultural biases that favour a lithe, ultra-fit body are equally pernicious in the way they equate the failure to achieve this arbitrary ideal with a failure to be well-adjusted and 'healthy' or even attractive. There is no uncontestable truth here either. And, again, it is the judgement attached to any perceived failure which has such large social ramifications--we often make ourselves sick in pursuit of such ideals, as rampant and widespread cases of clinical depression in society attest.
We need to cut ourselves and others a little slack. Life will never live up to our idealized versions of it. Ideals need to be handled with care, they exist as important sources of inspiration, but they have a dreadful tendency to turn into dogma, and at that point they become a sort of pollution in our life.
We need to re-examine our social and cultural biases using the edict of doing no harm as our guide.
Check this out: Jean Vanier - Becoming Human
Check this out: Jean Vanier - Becoming Human